203 lines
8.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
203 lines
8.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||
|
|
||
|
===========================
|
||
|
Test Style and Nomenclature
|
||
|
===========================
|
||
|
|
||
|
To make finding, writing, and using KUnit tests as simple as possible, it is
|
||
|
strongly encouraged that they are named and written according to the guidelines
|
||
|
below. While it is possible to write KUnit tests which do not follow these rules,
|
||
|
they may break some tooling, may conflict with other tests, and may not be run
|
||
|
automatically by testing systems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It is recommended that you only deviate from these guidelines when:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Porting tests to KUnit which are already known with an existing name.
|
||
|
2. Writing tests which would cause serious problems if automatically run. For
|
||
|
example, non-deterministically producing false positives or negatives, or
|
||
|
taking a long time to run.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Subsystems, Suites, and Tests
|
||
|
=============================
|
||
|
|
||
|
To make tests easy to find, they are grouped into suites and subsystems. A test
|
||
|
suite is a group of tests which test a related area of the kernel. A subsystem
|
||
|
is a set of test suites which test different parts of a kernel subsystem
|
||
|
or a driver.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Subsystems
|
||
|
----------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Every test suite must belong to a subsystem. A subsystem is a collection of one
|
||
|
or more KUnit test suites which test the same driver or part of the kernel. A
|
||
|
test subsystem should match a single kernel module. If the code being tested
|
||
|
cannot be compiled as a module, in many cases the subsystem should correspond to
|
||
|
a directory in the source tree or an entry in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. If
|
||
|
unsure, follow the conventions set by tests in similar areas.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test subsystems should be named after the code being tested, either after the
|
||
|
module (wherever possible), or after the directory or files being tested. Test
|
||
|
subsystems should be named to avoid ambiguity where necessary.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If a test subsystem name has multiple components, they should be separated by
|
||
|
underscores. *Do not* include "test" or "kunit" directly in the subsystem name
|
||
|
unless we are actually testing other tests or the kunit framework itself. For
|
||
|
example, subsystems could be called:
|
||
|
|
||
|
``ext4``
|
||
|
Matches the module and filesystem name.
|
||
|
``apparmor``
|
||
|
Matches the module name and LSM name.
|
||
|
``kasan``
|
||
|
Common name for the tool, prominent part of the path ``mm/kasan``
|
||
|
``snd_hda_codec_hdmi``
|
||
|
Has several components (``snd``, ``hda``, ``codec``, ``hdmi``) separated by
|
||
|
underscores. Matches the module name.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Avoid names as shown in examples below:
|
||
|
|
||
|
``linear-ranges``
|
||
|
Names should use underscores, not dashes, to separate words. Prefer
|
||
|
``linear_ranges``.
|
||
|
``qos-kunit-test``
|
||
|
This name should use underscores, and not have "kunit-test" as a
|
||
|
suffix. ``qos`` is also ambiguous as a subsystem name, because several parts
|
||
|
of the kernel have a ``qos`` subsystem. ``power_qos`` would be a better name.
|
||
|
``pc_parallel_port``
|
||
|
The corresponding module name is ``parport_pc``, so this subsystem should also
|
||
|
be named ``parport_pc``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. note::
|
||
|
The KUnit API and tools do not explicitly know about subsystems. They are
|
||
|
a way of categorizing test suites and naming modules which provides a
|
||
|
simple, consistent way for humans to find and run tests. This may change
|
||
|
in the future.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Suites
|
||
|
------
|
||
|
|
||
|
KUnit tests are grouped into test suites, which cover a specific area of
|
||
|
functionality being tested. Test suites can have shared initialization and
|
||
|
shutdown code which is run for all tests in the suite. Not all subsystems need
|
||
|
to be split into multiple test suites (for example, simple drivers).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test suites are named after the subsystem they are part of. If a subsystem
|
||
|
contains several suites, the specific area under test should be appended to the
|
||
|
subsystem name, separated by an underscore.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the event that there are multiple types of test using KUnit within a
|
||
|
subsystem (for example, both unit tests and integration tests), they should be
|
||
|
put into separate suites, with the type of test as the last element in the suite
|
||
|
name. Unless these tests are actually present, avoid using ``_test``, ``_unittest``
|
||
|
or similar in the suite name.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The full test suite name (including the subsystem name) should be specified as
|
||
|
the ``.name`` member of the ``kunit_suite`` struct, and forms the base for the
|
||
|
module name. For example, test suites could include:
|
||
|
|
||
|
``ext4_inode``
|
||
|
Part of the ``ext4`` subsystem, testing the ``inode`` area.
|
||
|
``kunit_try_catch``
|
||
|
Part of the ``kunit`` implementation itself, testing the ``try_catch`` area.
|
||
|
``apparmor_property_entry``
|
||
|
Part of the ``apparmor`` subsystem, testing the ``property_entry`` area.
|
||
|
``kasan``
|
||
|
The ``kasan`` subsystem has only one suite, so the suite name is the same as
|
||
|
the subsystem name.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Avoid names, for example:
|
||
|
|
||
|
``ext4_ext4_inode``
|
||
|
There is no reason to state the subsystem twice.
|
||
|
``property_entry``
|
||
|
The suite name is ambiguous without the subsystem name.
|
||
|
``kasan_integration_test``
|
||
|
Because there is only one suite in the ``kasan`` subsystem, the suite should
|
||
|
just be called as ``kasan``. Do not redundantly add
|
||
|
``integration_test``. It should be a separate test suite. For example, if the
|
||
|
unit tests are added, then that suite could be named as ``kasan_unittest`` or
|
||
|
similar.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test Cases
|
||
|
----------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Individual tests consist of a single function which tests a constrained
|
||
|
codepath, property, or function. In the test output, an individual test's
|
||
|
results will show up as subtests of the suite's results.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tests should be named after what they are testing. This is often the name of the
|
||
|
function being tested, with a description of the input or codepath being tested.
|
||
|
As tests are C functions, they should be named and written in accordance with
|
||
|
the kernel coding style.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. note::
|
||
|
As tests are themselves functions, their names cannot conflict with
|
||
|
other C identifiers in the kernel. This may require some creative
|
||
|
naming. It is a good idea to make your test functions `static` to avoid
|
||
|
polluting the global namespace.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Example test names include:
|
||
|
|
||
|
``unpack_u32_with_null_name``
|
||
|
Tests the ``unpack_u32`` function when a NULL name is passed in.
|
||
|
``test_list_splice``
|
||
|
Tests the ``list_splice`` macro. It has the prefix ``test_`` to avoid a
|
||
|
name conflict with the macro itself.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Should it be necessary to refer to a test outside the context of its test suite,
|
||
|
the *fully-qualified* name of a test should be the suite name followed by the
|
||
|
test name, separated by a colon (i.e. ``suite:test``).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test Kconfig Entries
|
||
|
====================
|
||
|
|
||
|
Every test suite should be tied to a Kconfig entry.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This Kconfig entry must:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* be named ``CONFIG_<name>_KUNIT_TEST``: where <name> is the name of the test
|
||
|
suite.
|
||
|
* be listed either alongside the config entries for the driver/subsystem being
|
||
|
tested, or be under [Kernel Hacking]->[Kernel Testing and Coverage]
|
||
|
* depend on ``CONFIG_KUNIT``.
|
||
|
* be visible only if ``CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS`` is not enabled.
|
||
|
* have a default value of ``CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS``.
|
||
|
* have a brief description of KUnit in the help text.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If we are not able to meet above conditions (for example, the test is unable to
|
||
|
be built as a module), Kconfig entries for tests should be tristate.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For example, a Kconfig entry might look like:
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. code-block:: none
|
||
|
|
||
|
config FOO_KUNIT_TEST
|
||
|
tristate "KUnit test for foo" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
|
||
|
depends on KUNIT
|
||
|
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
|
||
|
help
|
||
|
This builds unit tests for foo.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general,
|
||
|
please refer to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If unsure, say N.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Test File and Module Names
|
||
|
==========================
|
||
|
|
||
|
KUnit tests can often be compiled as a module. These modules should be named
|
||
|
after the test suite, followed by ``_test``. If this is likely to conflict with
|
||
|
non-KUnit tests, the suffix ``_kunit`` can also be used.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The easiest way of achieving this is to name the file containing the test suite
|
||
|
``<suite>_test.c`` (or, as above, ``<suite>_kunit.c``). This file should be
|
||
|
placed next to the code under test.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If the suite name contains some or all of the name of the test's parent
|
||
|
directory, it may make sense to modify the source filename to reduce redundancy.
|
||
|
For example, a ``foo_firmware`` suite could be in the ``foo/firmware_test.c``
|
||
|
file.
|