108 lines
4.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
108 lines
4.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. _maintainerentryprofile:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Maintainer Entry Profile
|
||
|
|
========================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Maintainer Entry Profile supplements the top-level process documents
|
||
|
|
(submitting-patches, submitting drivers...) with
|
||
|
|
subsystem/device-driver-local customs as well as details about the patch
|
||
|
|
submission life-cycle. A contributor uses this document to level set
|
||
|
|
their expectations and avoid common mistakes; maintainers may use these
|
||
|
|
profiles to look across subsystems for opportunities to converge on
|
||
|
|
common practices.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Overview
|
||
|
|
--------
|
||
|
|
Provide an introduction to how the subsystem operates. While MAINTAINERS
|
||
|
|
tells the contributor where to send patches for which files, it does not
|
||
|
|
convey other subsystem-local infrastructure and mechanisms that aid
|
||
|
|
development.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Example questions to consider:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Are there notifications when patches are applied to the local tree, or
|
||
|
|
merged upstream?
|
||
|
|
- Does the subsystem have a patchwork instance? Are patchwork state
|
||
|
|
changes notified?
|
||
|
|
- Any bots or CI infrastructure that watches the list, or automated
|
||
|
|
testing feedback that the subsystem uses to gate acceptance?
|
||
|
|
- Git branches that are pulled into -next?
|
||
|
|
- What branch should contributors submit against?
|
||
|
|
- Links to any other Maintainer Entry Profiles? For example a
|
||
|
|
device-driver may point to an entry for its parent subsystem. This makes
|
||
|
|
the contributor aware of obligations a maintainer may have for
|
||
|
|
other maintainers in the submission chain.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Submit Checklist Addendum
|
||
|
|
-------------------------
|
||
|
|
List mandatory and advisory criteria, beyond the common "submit-checklist",
|
||
|
|
for a patch to be considered healthy enough for maintainer attention.
|
||
|
|
For example: "pass checkpatch.pl with no errors, or warning. Pass the
|
||
|
|
unit test detailed at $URI".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The Submit Checklist Addendum can also include details about the status
|
||
|
|
of related hardware specifications. For example, does the subsystem
|
||
|
|
require published specifications at a certain revision before patches
|
||
|
|
will be considered.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Key Cycle Dates
|
||
|
|
---------------
|
||
|
|
One of the common misunderstandings of submitters is that patches can be
|
||
|
|
sent at any time before the merge window closes and can still be
|
||
|
|
considered for the next -rc1. The reality is that most patches need to
|
||
|
|
be settled in soaking in linux-next in advance of the merge window
|
||
|
|
opening. Clarify for the submitter the key dates (in terms of -rc release
|
||
|
|
week) that patches might be considered for merging and when patches need to
|
||
|
|
wait for the next -rc. At a minimum:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Last -rc for new feature submissions:
|
||
|
|
New feature submissions targeting the next merge window should have
|
||
|
|
their first posting for consideration before this point. Patches that
|
||
|
|
are submitted after this point should be clear that they are targeting
|
||
|
|
the NEXT+1 merge window, or should come with sufficient justification
|
||
|
|
why they should be considered on an expedited schedule. A general
|
||
|
|
guideline is to set expectation with contributors that new feature
|
||
|
|
submissions should appear before -rc5.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions
|
||
|
|
Indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch
|
||
|
|
set will need to wait for the NEXT+1 merge window. Of course there is no
|
||
|
|
obligation to ever accept any given patchset, but if the review has not
|
||
|
|
concluded by this point the expectation is the contributor should wait and
|
||
|
|
resubmit for the following merge window.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Optional:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- First -rc at which the development baseline branch, listed in the
|
||
|
|
overview section, should be considered ready for new submissions.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Review Cadence
|
||
|
|
--------------
|
||
|
|
One of the largest sources of contributor angst is how soon to ping
|
||
|
|
after a patchset has been posted without receiving any feedback. In
|
||
|
|
addition to specifying how long to wait before a resubmission this
|
||
|
|
section can also indicate a preferred style of update like, resend the
|
||
|
|
full series, or privately send a reminder email. This section might also
|
||
|
|
list how review works for this code area and methods to get feedback
|
||
|
|
that are not directly from the maintainer.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Existing profiles
|
||
|
|
-----------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For now, existing maintainer profiles are listed here; we will likely want
|
||
|
|
to do something different in the near future.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
.. toctree::
|
||
|
|
:maxdepth: 1
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
../doc-guide/maintainer-profile
|
||
|
|
../nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile
|
||
|
|
../riscv/patch-acceptance
|
||
|
|
../driver-api/media/maintainer-entry-profile
|
||
|
|
../driver-api/vfio-pci-device-specific-driver-acceptance
|
||
|
|
../nvme/feature-and-quirk-policy
|